[Notes on Diffy Qs home] [PDF version] [Buy cheap paperback version]
[next] [prev] [prev-tail] [tail] [up]
Note: 2 lectures, §3.5 in [EP], §3.5 and §3.6 in [BD]
We have solved linear constant coefficient homogeneous equations. What about nonhomogeneous linear ODEs? For example, the equations for forced mechanical vibrations. That is, suppose we have an equation such as
|
|
(2.6) |
We will write
when the exact form of the operator is not important. We solve (2.6) in the following manner. First, we find the general solution
to the associated homogeneous equation
|
|
(2.7) |
We call
the complementary solution. Next, we find a single particular solution
to (2.6) in some way. Then
|
|
is the general solution to (2.6). We have
and
. As
is a linear operator we verify that
is a solution,
. Let us see why we obtain the general solution.
Let
and
be two different particular solutions to (2.6). Write the difference as
. Then plug
into the left hand side of the equation to get
|
|
Using the operator notation the calculation becomes simpler. As
is a linear operator we write
|
|
So
is a solution to (2.7), that is
. Any two solutions of (2.6) differ by a solution to the homogeneous equation (2.7). The solution
includes all solutions to (2.6), since
is the general solution to the associated homogeneous equation.
Theorem 2.5.1. Let
be a linear ODE (not necessarily constant coefficient). Let
be the complementary solution (the general solution to the associated homogeneous equation
) and let
be any particular solution to
. Then the general solution to
is
|
|
The moral of the story is that we can find the particular solution in any old way. If we find a different particular solution (by a different method, or simply by guessing), then we still get the same general solution. The formula may look different, and the constants we will have to choose to satisfy the initial conditions may be different, but it is the same solution.
The trick is to somehow, in a smart way, guess one particular solution to (2.6). Note that
is a polynomial, and the left hand side of the equation will be a polynomial if we let
be a polynomial of the same degree. Let us try
|
|
We plug in to obtain
|
|
So
. Therefore,
and
. That means
. Solving the complementary problem (exercise!) we get
|
|
Hence the general solution to (2.6) is
|
|
Now suppose we are further given some initial conditions. For example,
and
. First find
. Then
|
|
We solve to get
and
. The particular solution we want is
|
|
Exercise 2.5.1: Check that
really solves the equation (2.6) and the given initial conditions.
Note: A common mistake is to solve for constants using the initial conditions with
and only add the particular solution
after that. That will not work. You need to first compute
and only then solve for the constants using the initial conditions.
A right hand side consisting of exponentials, sines, and cosines can be handled similarly. For example,
|
|
Let us find some
. We start by guessing the solution includes some multiple of
. We may have to also add a multiple of
to our guess since derivatives of cosine are sines. We try
|
|
We plug
into the equation and we get
|
|
The left hand side must equal to right hand side. We group terms and we get that
and
. So
and
and hence
and
. So
|
|
Similarly, if the right hand side contains exponentials we try exponentials. For example, for
|
|
we will try
as our guess and try to solve for
.
When the right hand side is a multiple of sines, cosines, exponentials, and polynomials, we can use the product rule for differentiation to come up with a guess. We need to guess a form for
such that
is of the same form, and has all the terms needed to for the right hand side. For example,
|
|
For this equation, we will guess
|
|
We will plug in and then hopefully get equations that we can solve for
and
. As you can see this can make for a very long and tedious calculation very quickly. C’est la vie!
There is one hiccup in all this. It could be that our guess actually solves the associated homogeneous equation. That is, suppose we have
|
|
We would love to guess
, but if we plug this into the left hand side of the equation we get
|
|
There is no way we can choose
to make the left hand side be
. The trick in this case is to multiply our guess by
to get rid of duplication with the complementary solution. That is first we compute
(solution to
)
|
|
and we note that the
term is a duplicate with our desired guess. We modify our guess to
and notice there is no duplication anymore. Let us try. Note that
and
. So
|
|
Thus
is supposed to equal
. Hence,
and so
. We can now write the general solution as
|
|
It is possible that multiplying by
does not get rid of all duplication. For example,
|
|
The complementary solution is
. Guessing
would not get us anywhere. In this case we want to guess
. Basically, we want to multiply our guess by
until all duplication is gone. But no more! Multiplying too many times will not work.
Finally, what if the right hand side has several terms, such as
|
|
In this case we find
that solves
and
that solves
(that is, do each term separately). Then note that if
, then
. This is because
is linear; we have
.
The method of undetermined coefficients will work for many basic problems that crop up. But it does not work all the time. It only works when the right hand side of the equation
has only finitely many linearly independent derivatives, so that we can write a guess that consists of them all. Some equations are a bit tougher. Consider
|
|
Note that each new derivative of
looks completely different and cannot be written as a linear combination of the previous derivatives. We get
,
, etc….
This equation calls for a different method. We present the method of variation of parameters, which will handle any equation of the form
, provided we can solve certain integrals. For simplicity, we restrict ourselves to second order constant coefficient equations, but the method works for higher order equations just as well (the computations become more tedious). The method also works for equations with nonconstant coefficients, provided we can solve the associated homogeneous equation.
Perhaps it is best to explain this method by example. Let us try to solve the equation
|
|
First we find the complementary solution (solution to
). We get
, where
and
. To find a particular solution to the nonhomogeneous equation we try
|
|
where
and
are functions and not constants. We are trying to satisfy
. That gives us one condition on the functions
and
. Compute (note the product rule!)
|
|
We can still impose one more condition at our discretion to simplify computations (we have two unknown functions, so we should be allowed two conditions). We require that
. This makes computing the second derivative easier.
|
|
We have
and so
|
|
and hence
|
|
For
to satisfy
we must have
.
So what we need to solve are the two equations (conditions) we imposed on
and ![]()
![]() |
We can now solve for
and
in terms of
,
and
. We will always get these formulas for any
, where
. There is a general formula for the solution we can just plug into, but it is better to just repeat what we do below. In our case the two equations become


![]() |
|
|
Exercise 2.5.5: Setup the form of the particular solution but do not solve for the coefficients for
.
Exercise 2.5.6: Setup the form of the particular solution but do not solve for the coefficients for
.
Exercise 2.5.7: a) Using variation of parameters find a particular solution of
. b) Find a particular solution using undetermined coefficients. c) Are the two solutions you found the same? What is going on?
Exercise 2.5.8: Find a particular solution of
. It is OK to leave the answer as a definite integral.