[Notes on Diffy Qs home] [PDF version] [Buy cheap paperback version]

[next] [prev] [prev-tail] [tail] [up]

Note: 2 lectures, §3.6 in [EP], §3.8 in [BD]

Let us return back to the example of a mass on a spring. We now examine the case of forced oscillations, which we did not yet handle. That is, we consider the equation

for some nonzero . The setup is again: is mass, is friction, is the spring constant and is an external force acting on the mass.

We are interested in periodic forcing, such as noncentered rotating parts, or perhaps loud sounds, or other sources of periodic force. Once we learn about Fourier series in chapter 4, we will see that we cover all periodic functions by simply considering (or sine instead of cosine, the calculations are essentially the same).

First let us consider undamped () motion for simplicity. We have the equation

This equation has the complementary solution (solution to the associated homogeneous equation)

where is the natural frequency (angular). It is the frequency at which the system “wants to oscillate” without external interference.

Let us suppose that . We try the solution and solve for . Note that we do not need a sine in our trial solution as after plugging in we only have cosines. If you include a sine, it is fine; you will find that its coefficient is zero (I could not find a second rhyme).

We solve using the method of undetermined coefficients. We find that

We leave it as an exercise to do the algebra required.

The general solution is

Written another way

The solution is a superposition of two cosine waves at different frequencies.

Let us compute. First we read off the parameters: , , , . The general solution is

Solve for and using the initial conditions. It is easy to see that and . Hence

Notice the “beating” behavior in Figure 2.5. First use the trigonometric identity

to get that

Notice that is a high frequency wave modulated by a low frequency wave.

Now suppose that . Obviously, we cannot try the solution and then use the method of undetermined coefficients. We notice that solves the associated homogeneous equation. Therefore, we need to try . This time we do need the sine term since the second derivative of does contain sines. We write the equation

Plugging into the left hand side we get

Hence and . Our particular solution is and our general solution is

The important term is the last one (the particular solution we found). This term grows without bound as . In fact it oscillates between and . The first two terms only oscillate between , which becomes smaller and smaller in proportion to the oscillations of the last term as gets larger. In Figure 2.6 we see the graph with , , , .

By forcing the system in just the right frequency we produce very wild oscillations. This kind of behavior is called resonance or perhaps pure resonance. Sometimes resonance is desired. For example, remember when as a kid you could start swinging by just moving back and forth on the swing seat in the “correct frequency”? You were trying to achieve resonance. The force of each one of your moves was small, but after a while it produced large swings.

On the other hand resonance can be destructive. In an earthquake some buildings collapse while others may be relatively undamaged. This is due to different buildings having different resonance frequencies. So figuring out the resonance frequency can be very important.

A common (but wrong) example of destructive force of resonance is the Tacoma Narrows bridge failure. It turns out there was a different phenomenon at play^{1}.

In real life things are not as simple as they were above. There is, of course, some damping. Our equation becomes

(2.8) |

for some . We have solved the homogeneous problem before. We let

We replace equation (2.8) with

The roots of the characteristic equation of the associated homogeneous problem are . The form of the general solution of the associated homogeneous equation depends on the sign of , or equivalently on the sign of , as we have seen before. That is,

where . In any case, we see that as . Furthermore, there can be no conflicts when trying to solve for the undetermined coefficients by trying . Let us plug in and solve for and . We get (the tedious details are left to reader)

We solve for and :

We also compute to beThus our particular solution is

Or in the alternative notation we have amplitude and phase shift where (if )

Hence we have

If we see that , , and .

The exact formula is not as important as the idea. Do not memorize the above formula, you should instead remember the ideas involved. For a different forcing function , you will get a different formula for . So there is no point in memorizing this specific formula. You can always recompute it later or look it up if you really need it.

For reasons we will explain in a moment, we call the transient solution and denote it by . We call the we found above the steady periodic solution and denote it by . The general solution to our problem is

We note that goes to zero as , as all the terms involve an exponential with a negative exponent. So for large , the effect of is negligible and we see essentially only . Hence the name transient. Notice that involves no arbitrary constants, and the initial conditions only affect . This means that the effect of the initial conditions is negligible after some period of time. Because of this behavior, we might as well focus on the steady periodic solution and ignore the transient solution. See Figure 2.7 for a graph given several different initial conditions.

The speed at which goes to zero depends on (and hence ). The bigger is (the bigger is), the “faster” becomes negligible. So the smaller the damping, the longer the “transient region.” This agrees with the observation that when , the initial conditions affect the behavior for all time (i.e. an infinite “transient region”).

Let us describe what we mean by resonance when damping is present. Since there were no conflicts when solving with undetermined coefficient, there is no term that goes to infinity. We look at the maximum value of the amplitude of the steady periodic solution. Let be the amplitude of . If we plot as a function of (with all other parameters fixed) we can find its maximum. We call the that achieves this maximum the practical resonance frequency. We call the maximal amplitude the practical resonance amplitude. Thus when damping is present we talk of practical resonance rather than pure resonance. A sample plot for three different values of is given in Figure 2.8. As you can see the practical resonance amplitude grows as damping gets smaller, and any practical resonance can disappear when damping is large.

To find the maximum we need to find the derivative . Computation shows

This is zero either when or when . In other words, when

It can be shown that if is positive, then is the practical resonance frequency (that is the point where is maximal, note that in this case for small ). If is the maximum, then essentially there is no practical resonance since we assume that in our system. In this case the amplitude gets larger as the forcing frequency gets smaller.

If practical resonance occurs, the frequency is smaller than . As the damping (and hence ) becomes smaller, the practical resonance frequency goes to . So when damping is very small, is a good estimate of the resonance frequency. This behavior agrees with the observation that when , then is the resonance frequency.

The behavior is more complicated if the forcing function is not an exact cosine wave, but for example a square wave. It will be good to come back to this section once we have learned about the Fourier series.

Exercise 2.6.3: Take . Fix , , and . Consider the function . For what values of (solve in terms of , , and ) will there be no practical resonance (that is, for what values of is there no maximum of for )?

Exercise 2.6.4: Take . Fix , , and . Consider the function . For what values of (solve in terms of , , and ) will there be no practical resonance (that is, for what values of is there no maximum of for )?

Exercise 2.6.5: Suppose a water tower in an earthquake acts as a mass-spring system. Assume that the container on top is full and the water does not move around. The container then acts as a mass and the support acts as the spring, where the induced vibrations are horizontal. Suppose that the container with water has a mass of . It takes a force of 1000 newtons to displace the container 1 meter. For simplicity assume no friction. When the earthquake hits the water tower is at rest (it is not moving).

Suppose that an earthquake induces an external force .

a) What is the natural frequency of the water tower?

b) If is not the natural frequency, find a formula for the maximal amplitude of the resulting oscillations of the water container (the maximal deviation from the rest position). The motion will be a high frequency wave modulated by a low frequency wave, so simply find the constant in front of the sines.

c) Suppose and an earthquake with frequency 0.5 cycles per second comes. What is the amplitude of the oscillations? Suppose that if the water tower moves more than 1.5 meter from the rest position, the tower collapses. Will the tower collapse?

Exercise 2.6.101: A mass of 4 kg on a spring with and a damping constant . Suppose that . Using forcing function , find the that causes practical resonance and find the amplitude.

Exercise 2.6.103: Suppose there is no damping in a mass and spring system with , , and . Suppose that is chosen to be precisely the resonance frequency. a) Find . b) Find the amplitude of the oscillations at time .

^{1}K. Billah and R. Scanlan, Resonance, Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure, and Undergraduate Physics Textbooks, American Journal of Physics, 59(2), 1991, 118–124, http://www.ketchum.org/billah/Billah-Scanlan.pdf